Upon to arrive towards the lab, users completed composed informed concur. Participants was basically seated at the a computer and you will expected to complete a beneficial survey, which included an evaluation away from character and you can inquiries examining intimate mate compatibility. Such as the last education, grandiose narcissism try analyzed towards Narcissistic Identification Collection (NPI ? = .86, Yards = , SD = eight.20) and you will Big Five personality traits with the Large Four Index (BFI) . Having neuroticism, ? = .82; Meters = dos.77, SD = 0.80; having extraversion, ? = .84, Yards = 3.46, SD = 0.72; getting openness to try out, ? = .75, Meters = 3.55, SD = 0.58; for conscientiousness, ? = .76; Meters = step 3.67, SD = 0.56; and for agreeableness, ? = .73, Meters = step 3.97, SD = 0.51.
This survey was not useful research as it is actually part of your safeguards tale. People was in fact informed that advice they provided is used to fit her or him up with anybody with the campus who may have similar passions. In the end, sex, years, and relationship reputation was indeed analyzed.
Pursuing the techniques detailed of the Parker and you can Burkley , members were second shown an image of an objective individual and you can informed that centered on its previous answers, he’s “comparable passions” with this particular target. The ladies viewed an image of a man target plus the guys seen an image of a woman address. These types of photographs were pre-looked at of the a good ple for their level of appeal using an excellent 10-section scale, in a way that step one = most unattractive and you will 10 = most glamorous. The latest suggest score for the male photographs is actually six.62 (SD = step 1.86) together with imply score for females photos are 7.03 (SD = step one.29). For example Parker and Burkley, i including expected professionals several questions regarding this new participant’s demand for the prospective, but the founded parameters was in fact only the products that assessed mate poaching especially. Responses have been made towards 5-area scales in a fashion that step 1 = most unlikely and you may 5 = most likely. The things have been an effective) “How more than likely can you getting to pursue this person to have good matchmaking?” (Meters = dos.43, SD = step one.28), and you will b) “Just how more than likely might you be making aside with this specific private?” (M = 2.38, SD = step one.34). I and reviewed brand new the total amount that brand new participant found this new target glamorous having fun with an excellent 5-part level in a fashion that step 1 = most unattractive and you can 5 = extremely glamorous (Meters = step 3.76, SD = step 1.15).
I very first built all the details before computing analyses. I following determined correlations anywhere between predictor/handle details (the big Four variables) and benefit variables, that are presented during the Dining table 6. Grandiose narcissism are correlated with a heightened probability of making out towards target, yet not which have picking out the address glamorous otherwise following the address having a romance.
I up coming joined parameters toward a beneficial regression model; number one variables of participants’ relationships position, target relationships condition, sex, and you will NPI results have been joined into Step one (dealing with to possess Large Four parameters), every two-means interactions certainly one of first details had been joined towards the Step two, all the three-way interactions certainly one of no. 1 parameters were joined for the Step three, and also the five-way correspondence certainly one of number 1 details try entered with the Step 4. As none of five-way relations attained statistical benefits, Step 3 analyses is actually advertised from inside the Dining table 7.
Players had been at random assigned to an explanation of one’s address because “single” or “inside the a romance” and you may was indeed following asked when planning on taking a short questionnaire towards the amount of attract they have in the target
For finding the prospective glamorous, simply main outcomes to possess gender and a beneficial participants’ relationship updates have been extreme. Males was in fact more likely to select the target attractive than girls, and american singles have been more likely to get the target attractive than simply connected people. Grandiose narcissism was not a good predictor of finding the goal glamorous generally speaking (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and grandiose narcissists didn’t look for affixed needs much more attractive than just unattached objectives (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).